uchihaitachi 10 發表於 July 14, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 14, 2007 Just a discuss...no other meaning in it~^^In fact, I think textbooks in Taiwan do little improvement to students except for somenew vocabulary and idioms.For instance, often you can see that many articles use the same form on sentences in order to emphasize the grammar in the unit. I think this is not a proper way of demonstrating how to write an article well. However, there are some good ones, too~ not much, though. What do you think?? 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
spacedunce-5 10 發表於 July 16, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 16, 2007 I believe an improvement of high school textbooks from junior high ones is that high school texts aren't written by the editors; rather, they are selected from works or articles whose authors have the courage and grasp of the English language to publish their thoughts --- which gives better examples of how English should be used. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 July 16, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 16, 2007 Raiding this thread for a bit of corrections :pJust a discuss...no other meaning in it~^^Just a discussion....no other intentions.In fact, I think textbooks in Taiwan do little improvement to students except for somenew vocabulary and idioms.In fact, I think textbooks in Taiwan do little improvement for students' understanding except building up vocabulary and idioms.For instance, often you can see that many articles use the same form on sentencesin order to emphasize the grammar in the unit. For example, examples that are used in textbooks often use the same grammatical form or sentence structure in order to emphasize the grammar, currently being explained in a particular chapter(is what I think you're trying to say - not sure what you mean by "unit")I think this is not a proper way of demonstratinghow to write an article well. I think this is not a proper way of demonstrating the practices of writing a good article.I believe an improvement of high school textbooks from junior high ones is that high school texts aren't written by the editorsI'm.....utterly confused as to what you're saying here. Re-phrase maybe? ^.^.||| (the rest are finewhose authors have the courage and grasp of the English languageWhat do you mean by "courage" here? Again, not entirely sure what you're trying to say. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
uchihaitachi 10 發表於 July 16, 2007 作者 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 16, 2007 Ha....thanks for your corrections~seems like that it is easily to occur mistakes~:p 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 July 16, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 16, 2007 seems like that it is easily to occur mistakes~Those mistakes seem to occur very often(is what I think you're trying to say. At least that's what it sounds like when I read that sentence in CHINESE grammatical form ^.^|||) 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Balie 10 發表於 July 16, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 16, 2007 I don't really like the English books we use now.They are very tedious, but I still study them hard.However, I usually try to capture the essence of what I have learned to improve my writing skill. I want to make the majority of whom read my article feel not TEDIOUS.(I don't expect me too much to write down an interesting article, but I will still try my level best to reach the standard.) 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 July 17, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 17, 2007 I want to make the majority of whom read my article feel not TEDIOUS.I want to make the majority of those that read my article to not feel it to be tedious when reading it.I don't expect me too much to write down an interesting article, but I will still try my level best to reach the standard.I don't expect myself too much to write an interesting article, but I still try my best to reach that standard.Question: Why are you guys using the word "article"? Are you actually writing an article? As in a newspaper article? It's confusing. I'm guessing you're thinking in terms of 文章 which probably is translated in dictionaries as "articles". However, that's misleading (or rather, INCORRECT altogether). There are different forms of writing. Essays, articles, editorials, informal essays, short stories, novels, poems, diary etc.What exactly is it that you are asked to write in class or are writing in your spare time? :s 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
damoko 10 發表於 July 17, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 17, 2007 I don't really like the English books we use now.They are very tedious, but I still study them hard.In fact, my English textbooks are boring too (when I was in the UK)However there are still some differences if you look them closer up. The most effective thing you can find out is that the UK ones are more logically edited. I have to say Taiwans quality is quite good, but there are many ODD words pop up in the sentences, which always makes my face look like this = =' lol 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
spacedunce-5 10 發表於 July 18, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 18, 2007 I'm.....utterly confused as to what you're saying here. Re-phrase maybe? ^.^.||| (the rest are fine.Textbooks in Taiwan are written by a group of "editors" who usually make up the texts.What do you mean by "courage" here? Again, not entirely sure what you're trying to say.Courage to publish their work and accept criticism. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
abtvctkto61 10 發表於 July 22, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 22, 2007 We should dump these textbooks, as they don't really do much (at least for me).They should give out novels instead of textbooks, which would probably be better if you want to learn how the English language is used. Also, a single story throughout the whole year should be more interesting than separate stories. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 July 22, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 22, 2007 Just prescribe 8 materials per year. That's what my school does. Two novels per term - 4 per semester. Learn much better and faster than anything.If they treat English proficiency so seriously at a national standard, then the best way to teach it is to NATURALIZE it. ie. make it part of the national language >_> *shrug* 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
jcpr_chen 10 發表於 July 23, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 23, 2007 The only purpose of a English textbook for me is to cover cup noodles and to spin it to piss my teacher that teaches Three Principles of People off. She once said, "If there are more of you type of people, Cheng Kung would be forced to close down!!" 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Balie 10 發表於 July 24, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 24, 2007 have to say Taiwans quality is quite good, but there are many ODD words pop up in the sentences, which always makes my face look like this = =' lolSome essays in the magazine are also odd. I don't think REAL native speakers would write essays like those.(The essays in some magazines are written by some native speakers; however, they want to make their words accepted by students in Taiwan, so I think it is the main factor that makes the essays in some magazines unnatural. )Therefore, I don't like to the magazine subscribed by my school.I prefer to find out more information to read so that I can gain access to some more NATURAL essays.:o 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 July 25, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 25, 2007 I prefer to find out more information to read so that I can gain access to some more NATURAL essaysGet Time and National Geographic and read news articles online 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
phoenix_of_flame 10 發表於 July 28, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 28, 2007 We should dump these textbooks, as they don't really do much (at least for me).They should give out novels instead of textbooks, which would probably be better if you want to learn how the English language is used. Also, a single story throughout the whole year should be more interesting than separate stories.yes i totally agree~ 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
uchihaitachi 10 發表於 July 28, 2007 作者 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 28, 2007 But novels sometimes are too hard for some students.Although I agree to read novels, yet never let reading novels be an exam item is better!! 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
VJ 10 發表於 July 29, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 July 29, 2007 I think that the text books provides us with samples. Then teachers explain the grammar to students and solve the problems of English learning. Reading novels is another way to English but I don't think that every students in Taiwan are capable of it. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
john800103 10 發表於 August 5, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 5, 2007 Well, I think the textbook is quiet BORING.Because the titles are so boring. The articles are just way too shallow.....They don't really teach us anything except some new words or idioms....but novels are some times too hard for some students...some students can't even handle the articles in the textbook. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
uchihaitachi 10 發表於 August 6, 2007 作者 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 6, 2007 How about those magazines??? ex: Studio、Time.....Or buying textbooks in America??? xdIs this proper in Taiwan??? 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
MikiRei 10 發表於 August 7, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 7, 2007 Although I agree to read novels, yet never let reading novels be an exam item is better!!??? Confused. What do you mean? It's better if they don't use novels as exam material? Is that what you're saying?quiet BORING.QUITE. Not quiet.Well, I think the textbook is quiet BORING.Because the titles are so boring. Well, I think the textbooks are quite boring because the titles are so boring.One sentence - not two. Don't start a sentence with "because".Is this proper in Taiwan?What's proper in Taiwan? Buying textbooks in America? What do you mean by "proper"? :s 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
metaphor 10 發表於 August 9, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 9, 2007 English textbooks in Taiwan aren't good sources of gaining more useful knowledge.Instead, magazines and novels are far better. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
ck10392000 10 發表於 August 24, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 24, 2007 The vocabulary and idioms in textbooks are not enough to cram.So I prefer to read BBC news in website. 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Jessica L 10 發表於 August 27, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 27, 2007 There are LOTS of kinds of textbooks you can find.I just cannot get your point very well, you mean the textbooks that help you improve your English skills or something else??If so, I do think reading novels helps a lot.Reading novels can make you improve your grammer, voc, essay, etc. when you read them sentence by sentence.Trust me, it helps.:E 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
yang28821587 10 發表於 September 1, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 September 1, 2007 The text book for junior high school is really boring....And the text book for senior high school...I have no idea. I am just in grade one... 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
蜜蜜佳 10 發表於 September 2, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 September 2, 2007 The textbook in senior high school is diffrient from junior high school .Senior’s is difficult . Junior’s is easy ! 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Recommended Posts
請登入後來留意見
在登入之後,您才能留意見
立即登入