michaelj 10 發表於 September 15, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 September 15, 2007 校長的回覆有提原因一切都是政府的政策 (茶)不過 我真的還是希望國一給一點刺激像是胡老大的教學就是很棒的刺激 XD 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
憂鬱的橘子 10 發表於 September 29, 2007 作者 檢舉 Share 發表於 September 29, 2007 我家不有錢.加上學校抓逃票抓很兇.本來高2沒感覺.現在上高3了.唉.你們能想像一個晩自習的高3生得提早半小時爬窗戶上夜校車媽 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
三刀holic 10 發表於 October 1, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 October 1, 2007 有校車司機跟某某車隊長說過:「其實每個只要交5000~6000就可以了!!!學校給你們收那麼多還不是一樣給我們那麼少而且還不是一次給完咧」這是真的嗎?那學校要好好檢討了~那些司機伯伯也真可憐~ 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
頹廢的風 10 發表於 October 1, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 October 1, 2007 又被重新撈上了~XD搞不好..學校早就想漲價..找不到理由...剛好一堆腦殘家長..因為小殘子女的關係...搞啥反應...學校就順應"民意"的漲價了.... 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
michaelj 10 發表於 October 2, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 October 2, 2007 The new policy is simply because of the law. The law that does not allow anyone standing has been there for a while. However, the government has not been enforcing it until last year. The school bus fare is simply the reflection of the cost increase.For years, some parents have always been asking for no-standing policy. School didn't think it's necessary until the law enforcement from the government. Therefore, we are not making this policy just to satisfy those parents.When I was a student here, there was no air condition in any classroom or dorm room. Today, A/C is the basic facility in all rooms. You won't think we are spoiling students, will you? Life is improving. School is improving. That's how I see it. According to this logic, maybe some of you can see this new school bus policy as an improvement, maybe...Albert / principal大家都沒看校長回覆嗎 囧總之 校長的意思就是 這一切都是為了因應政府的規定不過這還是不會改變我對國一某些同學的想法 (tea) 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Recommended Posts
請登入後來留意見
在登入之後,您才能留意見
立即登入