白鹿 11 發表於 August 17, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 17, 2007 以下段落是出自道金斯的文章原始連結http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/dawkins/lecture_p9.html我看不懂紅色部份的意思...Of this, Sir Arthur Eddington said: "If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then so much the worse for Maxwell's equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation - well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation." 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
evadne 11 發表於 August 17, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 17, 2007 If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then so much the worse for Maxwell's equations.我猜:If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations - then , what a pity of Maxwell's equations! 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
RPC 10 發表於 August 30, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 August 30, 2007 (突然撞進來) 我覺得這個原作者寫的好毒 分明是用戲謔略帶「耍人」性質的「居高臨下」型英文 好像老人寫的.... "ugh, ugh, ugh~!(搖手指) Too bad for you." 不過保證是印象深刻就是了 要學起來 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
liltwnboiz 10 發表於 September 18, 2007 檢舉 Share 發表於 September 18, 2007 因為馬克思威爾方程式仍然是一個在科學界不確定的話題所以如果你的論點和馬克思威爾方程式產生衝突馬克思威爾方程式也同樣會受到質疑所以 so much the worse = 同樣壞 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Recommended Posts
請登入後來留意見
在登入之後,您才能留意見
立即登入