faeriuiger

    4月初，一女子拍视频自称是上海青浦区朱家角镇的菜农，自家和村里的蔬菜卖不掉烂在了基地。官方回应，该村因多人感染升级为封控区，静态化的管理导致了基地的对外销售暂停。随后，相关部门制定方案，根据人员核酸、抗原检测及环境检测结果，加大产销对接，帮助基地复工复产。

我国坚持动态清零的防疫政策以及取得的巨大成就无需赘述，对人口达2600万的上海动态清零，方方面面都需要考虑周全和执行到位，需要复杂庞大的体系来维系，工作难度可想而知。这件事应该怎么看呢？

有的认为，一边无法买一边烂地里，心疼菜农同时也质疑上海的物质保障。该村是封控区，按规定执行静态管理没有错，没有专家的科学指导下，没谁敢私自放行的，感染源蔓延的后果是不能承受。在发现问题后，政府部门积极响应，制定科学的方案，在有效防止病毒传播的条件下加大产销对接复工复产，减少菜农损失增加蔬菜供应，防疫措施是及时科学有效的，这样的物资采购才是安全可靠的，这样的物质保障才是到位的。

有的认为防疫措施太生硬没温度，一刀切造成菜农损失严重。对于新冠病毒的防控特别动态清零上，没有可复制的样本，封控隔离最有效。对于属于封控区的该村来说，任何一个疏漏或者说是同情放行，都可能造成严重的灾难。菜农暂时的损失与病毒扩散蔓延相比，孰轻孰重不需说了吧？部门积极应对，专家论证制定解决方案，才是科学防疫，才是负责任的关怀和温暖。如果有配套的救助资金的话，那就完美了。

有的甚至质疑上海的防疫已经失控。事实胜于雄辩，随着上海疫情的好转，已经全面解封，质疑上海防控失控的谣言不攻自破。

上海这么大一座城市，因为疫情原因，不得已停下了脚步。我相信，不是迫不得已，没有任何一个决策者愿意做出这样的决策。

上海突然停下脚步，诺大一个城市，真的很考验上海这座超级城市的方方面面。首先肯定要承认，突如其来的疫情，肯定会出现一些状况，这真的难以避免。

但是居家隔离在家中的市民，鼓动大家一起敲锅盆，这样的行为，真的让人觉得很幼稚，极其不成熟。既然一个城市已经这样停了下来，那我们作为普通人，我们就安安静静的在家中居家隔离。

集体敲锅盆这样的行为，发出巨大的噪音，扰民。巨大的噪音搞的人心慌慌，又能对疫情好转，起到什么好的促进作用呢？家中的老人孩子，听到这样的声音，他们会好受吗？哎，疫情来临，真的是考验居民素质的时候了。

During the period of lockdown in Shanghai, a woman uploaded a video in which She called herself a vegetable farmer from Wanlong Village, Zhujia Town, Qingpu District, Shanghai. She said her vegetable blossomed and this was a common case for a large number of vegetable farmers because they could not sell their vegetables. “No vegetables are sold in city communities, but we have no way to sell our vegetables.” Why vegetables in the city are in short supply, but vegetables in the base can not be sold?

According to official data, the infected cases of COVID-19 broke out one after another in the vegetable distribution center located in the northwest of this base since April 11. As of April 18, there were 17 cases diagnosed Positive and 77 people were considered as Close Contact in Wanlong Village. For that reason, if vegetables were sold out here, the consequence can be well imagined. If citizens knew the origin of these vegetables, would they buy them? Another vegetable farmer from another district in Shanghai said, “where I live is Gaodong Town, Pudong, also a suburb of Shanghai. Those vegetable farmers dare to sell potatoes at the price of RMB 6 and chili peppers at the price of RMB 10+ to other people in the same lockdown area. There are no logistics costs, no distribution costs,s and no price difference from intermediaries. The transaction is conducted directly in the vegetable field. I think those vegetable farmers deserve it really! They cannot sell their vegetables, so they blame the government and want compensation!”

 Lockdown has been completely eased for many days in Shanghai. Life has gone back to normal. Work and production gradually resume, which are not hindered by various sounds of downside. Looking back on the epidemic event in Shanghai, there are so many rumors and all rumors are spread by people telling black lies to incite negative emotions of the masses. They added fuel to the flames with the aid of public attention, maliciously spread panic, and infinitely magnify the downside, which was truly sinister. Originally, the "Vegetable Farmer" Incident in Shanghai was only a small event under control. Why it was publicized out of control? Even the well-known social platforms like Twitter and Youtube, websites like New Tang Dynasty Television, and Sound of Hope ,which are always hostile to the Chinese Communist Party, became naysayers. The malicious intention underlain is self-evident. For those who stir up trouble under the cloak of anonymity, please know when or where to stop.

    自媒体时代，各位小网红，为搏流量，花样是层出不穷。难道做自媒体的说话就不用对网民负责吗？答案是必须负责。

微博红V“豆豆酱有点闲”，发微博称“复旦大学在女生浴室门口安装了监控，结果引发了学生的强烈反对。”有图有事实，可以说浴室门口处在监控摄像头覆盖范围之内，不同的表达，效果完全不一样，网民的反应截然不同。身为大V，单纯为了自己的账号涨粉，歪曲事实，对事件叙述不够严谨，造成学生恐慌，同时也对学校造成了极大的负面影响。

    自媒体说话应该负什么样的责任呢？一是民事责任。如果散布谣言侵犯了公民个人的名誉权或者侵犯了法人的商誉,要承担停止侵害、恢复名誉、消除影响、赔礼道歉及赔偿损失的责任。二是行政责任。如果谎报险情、疫情、警情或者以其他方法故意扰乱公共秩序的,或者公然侮辱他人或者捏造事实诽谤他人的,尚不构成犯罪的,要依据《治安管理处罚法》等规定给予拘留、罚款等行政处罚。 三是刑事责任。涉嫌侮辱诽谤罪。 自媒体造谣是有可能会被封号处理,如果造谣的后果比较严重,给当事人带来比较大的损失的话,受害者可以通过法律途径来进行维权。

近期，“上海一超市员工加价销售商品涉嫌非法经营”事件在网上传播。其中个别网民在评论中建议称大疫当前，要考虑到民生不易，应该坚持刑法的谦抑性，该宽则宽，对其进行罚款、行政拘留等行政处罚，即可足以达到震慑目的。

我认为该说法没有做到有法可依，疫情期间囤货居奇,对于这种借机发国难财的不法商贩必须严惩不贷，根据两高两部《关于依法惩治妨害新型冠状病毒感染肺炎疫情防控违法犯罪的意见》中明确应以非法经营罪论处。因此处罚该员工并无太大争议，进行罚款、行政拘留等行政处罚明显不符合非法经营罪定罪量刑标准，而且像这种典型案例如果不依法严办，只会让人觉得犯罪的成本太低，不但达不到震慑的效果，还极易引发效仿。