sandman 11 發表於 December 5, 2013 檢舉 Share 發表於 December 5, 2013 如果是真的應該就是達爾文變異與天擇是隨機發生,又存活下來的--------------------------------------------------------美遺傳學家:人類是公豬與母猩猩雜交產物2013-12-02 更新分享| 分享至新浪微博 分享至facebook 分享至PLURK 分享至twitter [友善列印]美遺傳學家:人類是公豬與母猩猩雜交產物 導語:據英國《每日郵報》報道,來自美國喬治亞大學的遺傳學家麥卡錫(Eugene McCarthy)近日提出驚人假設:人類是由公豬跟母黑猩猩雜交而成。公豬和母猩猩(資料圖) 報道稱,大部份生物學家一直相信人類由猿猴進化而成。但研究動物混種培植的世界權威之一麥卡錫指出,人類雖然與猩猩存在很多相似特征,但是人類還有許多靈長類動物沒有的特點。而麥卡錫認為,這些特點都能在豬身上找到,例如皮膚無毛、有厚厚的皮下脂肪、眼珠較淺色、鼻子突出、有濃密的睫毛等。 而且,人類皮膚結構和多個器官都與豬相似,豬的皮膚組織、心髒瓣膜甚至可以移植到人類身體上。 麥卡錫稱,最初的“猩豬”物種在經曆長時間的進化以及與猩猩經過多代繁衍後,使得該物種的特性越來越接近猩猩,而不是豬,最終進化成人類。 麥卡錫指出,人類是豬和猩猩交配後代的構想仍處於假設階段,他目前正在搜集大量證據來支持這一理論。 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
william.chen18 10 發表於 December 5, 2013 檢舉 Share 發表於 December 5, 2013 (已編輯) 如果是引述自紐約時報的正式報導,我就信台灣的低素質記者只會從國外的垃圾報抄無聊新聞 此內容已被編輯, December 6, 2013 ,由 william.chen18 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
司馬特 12 發表於 December 6, 2013 檢舉 Share 發表於 December 6, 2013 有經過DNA比對嗎?為什麼是公豬和母猩猩而不是母豬和公猩猩?與其蒐集大量證據 不如先去做豬的DNA排序比較重要吧先不說偶蹄目和靈長目有沒有辦法繁衍如果只是因為器官、組織結構、或體蛋白質相似就說有關連那我會覺得他只是個噱頭畢竟也有趨同演化、平行演化的可能 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
sandman 11 發表於 December 6, 2013 作者 檢舉 Share 發表於 December 6, 2013 (已編輯) 大概真的新聞台灣記者捏造不出這堆專業名詞~~或者 google查 eugene mccarthy pig但是拿來報導是英國每日郵報等花邊小道消息報不像NYTimes那麼正經八百 A list of traits distinguishing humans from other primates--------------------------------------------------------------------------------DERMAL FEATURESNaked skin (sparse pelage)Panniculus adiposus (layer of subcutaneous fat)Panniculus carnosus only in face and neckIn "hairy skin" region:- Thick epidermis- Crisscrossing congenital lines on epidermis- Patterned epidermal-dermal junctionLarge content of elastic fiber in skinThermoregulatory sweatingRichly vascularized dermisNormal host for the human flea (Pulex irritans)Dermal melanocytes absentMelanocytes present in matrix of hair follicleEpidermal lipids contain triglycerides and free fatty acidsFACIAL FEATURESLightly pigmented eyes commonProtruding, cartilaginous mucous noseNarrow eye openingShort, thick upper lipPhiltrum/cleft lipGlabrous mucous membrane bordering lipsEyebrowsHeavy eyelashesEarlobesFEATURES RELATING TO BIPEDALITYShort, dorsal spines on first six cervical vertebraeSeventh cervical vertebrae:- long dorsal spine- transverse foramensFewer floating and more non-floating ribsMore lumbar vertebraeFewer sacral vertebraeMore coccygeal vertebrae (long "tail bone")Centralized spineShort pelvis relative to body lengthSides of pelvis turn forwardSharp lumbo-sacral promontoryMassive gluteal musclesCurved sacrum with short dorsal spinesHind limbs longer than forelimbsFemur:- Condyles equal in size- Knock-kneed- Elliptical condyles- Deep intercondylar notch at lower end of femur- Deep patellar groove with high lateral lip- Crescent-shaped lateral meniscus with two tibial insertionsShort malleolus medialisTalus suited strictly for extension and flexion of the footLong calcaneus relative to foot (metatarsal) lengthShort digits (relative to chimpanzee)Terminal phalanges blunt (ungual tuberosities)Narrow pelvic outletORGANSDiverticulum at cardiac end of stomachValves of Kerkring present in small intestinesMesenteric arterial arcadesMultipyramidal kidneysHeart auricles levelTricuspid valve of heartLaryngeal sacs absentVocal ligamentsProstate encircles urethraBulbo-urethral glands presentOs penis (baculum) absent.HymenAbsence of periodic sexual swellings in femaleIschial callosities absentNipples low on chestBicornuate uterus (occasionally present in humans)Labia majoraCRANIAL FEATURESBrain lobes: frontal and temporal prominentThermoregulatory venous plexusesWell-developed system of emissary veinsEnlarged nasal bonesDivergent eyes (interior of orbit visible from side)Styloid processLarge occipital condylesPrimitive premolarLarge, blunt-cusped (bunodont) molarsThick tooth enamelHelical chewingBEHAVIORAL/PHYSIOLOGICALNocturnal activityParticular about place of defecationGood swimmer, no fear of waterExtended male copulation timeFemale orgasmShort menstrual cycleSnugglingTearsAlcoholismTerrestrialism (Non-arboreal)Able to exploit a wide range of environments and foodsRARE OR ABSENT IN NONHUMAN PRIMATES:Heart attackAtherosclerosisCancer (melanoma) 此內容已被編輯, December 6, 2013 ,由 sandman 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
訪客 發表於 February 1, 2014 檢舉 Share 發表於 February 1, 2014 每日郵報的反科學立場是很有名的。這個「遺傳學家」在2003年拿了遺傳學的博士學位後一直沒有正職,他寫的東西也沒有人認可。他說人是豬的後代,但沒有舉出任何合理的證據。這裡有篇完整認真的反駁:http://observationdeck.io9.com/no-humans-are-not-chimp-pig-hybrids-1474029809 鏈接文章 分享到其他網站
Recommended Posts
請登入後來留意見
在登入之後,您才能留意見
立即登入